I’ve always loved David Letterman’s shows and as a kid used to sneak out of bed at my grandparent’s house, sit in my grandpa’s big recliner and put his pipe laced with velvet tobacco and nicotine flavoring in my mouth and watch Late Night with Dave. In recent years, I’ve noticed what a good interviewer David Letterman can be. Seriously. When he has a political leader or more intellectual guest on, he can really hold his own. I think this has even surprised some unwitting guests. The most recent example of this was Sen. John McCain during the campaign last year. Many will remember
McCain snubbing Dave and fibbing just a bit about why he had to bail. That of course set Dave off on a campaign of his own to criticize the Republican nominee – sometimes humorously and sometimes quite seriously (see: satire). Eventually McCain had to take his medicine and return to face the music–whichever cliche you choose, it was awkward for McCain. You can watch it here. And frankly, I appreciated

Photo: NY Times
Dave for this interview because once he dispensed chastising McCain for dissing him, he moved on to challenging some of the McCain campaign’s questionable tactics and the senator’s own relationship with G. Gordon Liddy. I was a pretty faithful (addict) follower of the campaign, and I can’t remember anyone being as tough on McCain as Letterman was. Frankly, it was refreshing.
Then Letterman did a fearless job challenging Milorad “Rod” R. Blagojevich – the now impeached governor of Illinois. Dave let loose the second Blagojevich sat down asking, “Why exactly are you here, honest to God?” The then-governor answered, “I’ve been wanting to be on your show in the worst way for the longest time.” To which Letterman quipped, “Well, you’re on in the worst way, believe me.” Once again, I sat thinking, “Wow – why don’t journalists get after these guys this way?” Then, on a somewhat lighter note, there was the quite silly visit by M.C. Joaquin Phoenix. Regardless of whether Phoenix was just ‘in character’ or whether this was the too-legit-to-quit new Joaquin, it was Letterman at his best – “What can you tell me about your days with the unibomber?” Classic.
That leads to today’s example of relational similarity: Bob Woodward was to Carl Bernstein what John Stewart is to David Letterman. Huh?! Last night on The Daily Show with J.S., Jim Cramer “stepped into the (proverbial) octagon” with Stewart. And how’d it go? John Stewart hit him like a populist Mack truck going 80 mph. Cramer didn’t seem like a total schmutz – in fact overall he seems like one of the good guys (at least going forward and now that he’s not managing a hedge fund). However, Stewart put his feet to the fire – and all of CNBC – over how they reported on the financial crisis. In specific how they appeared to be almost in cahoots with dishonest CEOs and large corporations, or at least negligent in “missing” the depths of the collapse. It was a populist beat-down – particularly when Stewart played grainy video clips of Cramer himself endorsing and admitting dubious behavior as a hedge fund manager.
You can watch the rest of the interview on Stewart’s site here.
In closing, I say, as long as our government leaders are still sneaking in the pork, why not slide in a mandate that folks who need a little “feet to the fire” treatment trek before Letterman or Stewart? Because frankly, with the passing of Tim Russert, I’m beginning to think they’re the only ones willing to ask the hard questions right to their faces.